BHaines
Member
This weekend, i witnessed a play involving a first baseman and a batter running to first base that confused the heck out of me. In this case, there was a white first base and an orange safety base for the runner. The batter hit the ball to the third baseman, who then threw the ball to first base. The throw was off target up the first baseline causing the first baseman to stretch up the line towards home plate to make the catch. The first baseman still had her foot on the white base. The runner beat the throw ( she went to the orange safety base) but was then awarded second base by the plate umpire. When catching the ball (foot still on the white base) the first baseman's elbow and the shoulder of the runner clipped one another. Due to this, the home plate umpire called defensive interference and awarded the runner second base.
The coach of the first baseman argued that there was no interference, as the first baseman has the right to catch the thrown ball and since the runner was safe, there shouldn't be an award of an extra base. This play involved minimal contact between the fielder and the runner. Actually, had the runner been a little slower, the first baseman could have tagged the runner going to first as the off target throw took the first baseman up the line toward the runner. Any ideas on whether awarding an extra base was the right call or not?
The coach of the first baseman argued that there was no interference, as the first baseman has the right to catch the thrown ball and since the runner was safe, there shouldn't be an award of an extra base. This play involved minimal contact between the fielder and the runner. Actually, had the runner been a little slower, the first baseman could have tagged the runner going to first as the off target throw took the first baseman up the line toward the runner. Any ideas on whether awarding an extra base was the right call or not?