What I said I thought was pretty clear. I didn't say they weren't smart enough, I said common sense and experience. In a perfect world my catcher, my pitcher and I are all on the same page. I would have enough time to relay all I know about hitters I have seen in our conference for the past three years to my freshman catcher or first year starting sophomore catcher but sometimes that's not possible given we play 23 games in 27 days or whatever. As a school ball coach I don't have the reams of information that college coaches have to enable them to call every single pitch but I may know a bit more than my rookie catcher. I do agree that that a cathcer has a much better eye on what the hitters are doing in terms of position in the batters box, their demeanor, how blue is calling the zone, which pitches are working for my pitcher, etc. And I like the concept of letting her call the game with me having the option of calling a pitch when I really want that CU, rise or whatever. You can also have the situation of pitcher and catcher not liking each other or the pitcher not liking the pitch selection from the catcher. I had that in the past, it was funny yet exasperating to watch my pitcher shake off three called pitches in a row and then throw what she wanted anyway. I trusted my pitcher more than I did my catcher but she wanted to call games so I let her, until it obviously was causing game delays with all the shook off signs and tension between the two. Plus I couldn't convince this catcher that if the batter was fouling off pitches over the backstop that a drop ball wasn't the pitch to call or if if the RH batter kept pulling them foul that a CU might be a better pitch instead of a another FB. PS, If you are wondering why I would call or teach a FB, this girl's FB had good movement, a cutter type of break. If she threw it in the middle of the plate it was on the black by the time it crossed the plate. She had great natural movement.