@Musty:
I'm not sure that tournament directors DO put it all out there at a point in time when we are making decisions about schedules for the team. I'll just have to make a checklist of things that I will publicly (that is, on here) ask the TD before the BHeat 95 makes its decision.
@ALL:
Another issue that really concerns the Buckeye Heat '95 coaching staff is the degree to which Friday early play is being considered "routine". When the TD has the option to limit the field, the decision to require early Friday play could be influenced by several factors. It could be that the tournament is an invitational and the TD has received many applications from extremely talented teams. It could be that the tournament is first-come, first-served and the TD decides to increase the bottom line by letting in additional teams. It could be, as with ASA/USA National qualifiers, that the tournament has very little choice about the number of teams that can attend the tournament.
BUT ONE THING IS CLEAR: early Friday and Thursday play will continue to separate the haves from the have-nots for Ohio fastpitch. Families with limited economic resources face very, very hard choices about funding Friday play. That funding includes missed wages.
As the players get older (I'm thinking the older 12U's), I actually think that a good response is to have a few parents cart the majority of the girls to the Friday play, with the rest of the parents being allowed their normal work days. The parents responsible for getting the girls there would rotate from week to week. It's hard for the parents to have to skip games, but some players would definitely benefit from having a few games without the pressure of parental review AND the family stress level would be reduced. Of course, after the players have their licenses, they can always get themselves to local and perhaps even more distant tournaments.
I understand that there will always be families that have more economic resources to devote to the game. I'd just like to see TD's take into consideration the impact on middle class families of extending the tournament fields to such a degree that early Friday play is required. If such an increase in the number of teams is based primarily upon the economic return to the tournament, at that point I'd have to question priorities.
And I'd certainly expect that there would be two umps available when the choice has been made to expand the number of teams.
Since this is essentially a hijack, I'll open a new thread.