PANTHER85 said:
I asked the ump why she wasnt out? he said" she did not do it on purpose"
The next words out of my mouth would be, "I want to file a protest".
This is a clear misapplication of the rule. "Intent" by the runner is not an issue when interfering with an untouched batted ball. It either hit her or it didn't and it's either interference or it's not. The runner may be hit "accidently" and it's still interference.
Yesterday, I was working a game and one of the teams was called The Panthers. We had a similar play, and at first I thought that it might have been your game. But I see you're in Norton- this game was in Westerville.
One more comment- an umpire should be willing to answer any question posed by a coach, as long as it is a legitimate question and the coach is asking in a civil manner. Umpires that stonewall with the, "One more word outta you..." threat are usually covering up their own shortcomings.
Save the "ejection" warnings for coaches that are over-the-line or out-of-control. If a coach has a question, hear him out, answer the question, then move on.