default
Member
Thanks again for all the answers.
I absolutely want our catcher throwing the ball. In fact, I'm steaming mad if she doesn't.
Let me ask this: If you found an unscratched lottery ticket on the ground with no apparent owner, would you not take it and scratch it off? That runner going to third is providing your defense a free lottery ticket. It costs you nothing to make the attempt.
Here is how I analyze it and how I implored our girls to look at it....
Since it's the last inning, first ask where the tying run is standing. By the time those first two runs have scores and the batter/runner is headed to third, it's 8-3, so the tying run is four batters away sitting in the dugout. Whether that girl headed to third winds up on third or scores, the tying run is still four batters away. Of course, if we get the batter/runner out, the tying run is now five batters away and we have one of our three outs.
Second, understand that the only way that runner headed to third can do us harm is if her team eventually gets the game tied. If her team gets the game tied, four more girls behind her will have scored. If four girls behind her end up scoring, she will have scored easily without having to take any chances and without us having an opportunity to get her out. Because she is not the tying run and the tying run will be no closer to scoring as a result of us throwing to third, she merely represents a free opportunity at an out for us, the defense. It costs us literally nothing, even if our catcher throws the ball over the left field fence. Well, it costs us a possible line drive to third that results in a double play, but that's rare, and if the runner is that dumb to get doubled off down five runs in the last inning....
Anyway, the one argument that people - and a couple of our players - tend to make is the momentum thing. And I argue that if the offense thinks it now has momentum because it's taking chances on the bases that give it no advantage, then that team simply doesn't understand basic math. If the defense feels like it needs to "stop the bleeding" or the circus or whatever, then the defense also doesn't understand the concept of the tying run being no closer to scoring until she is actually running the bases.
A bad throw to third here resulting in the runner scoring gives the offense no momentum, because it puts the offense no closer to getting the game tied than it was as soon as that batter/runner reached base. If the defense feels like things are falling apart or it is giving the offense momentum by making that throw, then someone needs to explain the math to the defense.
Anyway, I hope that makes some sense. One can argue the momentum angle, but I say even that is incorrect because it assumes neither team understands the concept of the tying run. Further, I can't measure momentum. I can measure the number of runs needed to tie the game and the number of outs needed to win the game.
I absolutely want our catcher throwing the ball. In fact, I'm steaming mad if she doesn't.
Let me ask this: If you found an unscratched lottery ticket on the ground with no apparent owner, would you not take it and scratch it off? That runner going to third is providing your defense a free lottery ticket. It costs you nothing to make the attempt.
Here is how I analyze it and how I implored our girls to look at it....
Since it's the last inning, first ask where the tying run is standing. By the time those first two runs have scores and the batter/runner is headed to third, it's 8-3, so the tying run is four batters away sitting in the dugout. Whether that girl headed to third winds up on third or scores, the tying run is still four batters away. Of course, if we get the batter/runner out, the tying run is now five batters away and we have one of our three outs.
Second, understand that the only way that runner headed to third can do us harm is if her team eventually gets the game tied. If her team gets the game tied, four more girls behind her will have scored. If four girls behind her end up scoring, she will have scored easily without having to take any chances and without us having an opportunity to get her out. Because she is not the tying run and the tying run will be no closer to scoring as a result of us throwing to third, she merely represents a free opportunity at an out for us, the defense. It costs us literally nothing, even if our catcher throws the ball over the left field fence. Well, it costs us a possible line drive to third that results in a double play, but that's rare, and if the runner is that dumb to get doubled off down five runs in the last inning....
Anyway, the one argument that people - and a couple of our players - tend to make is the momentum thing. And I argue that if the offense thinks it now has momentum because it's taking chances on the bases that give it no advantage, then that team simply doesn't understand basic math. If the defense feels like it needs to "stop the bleeding" or the circus or whatever, then the defense also doesn't understand the concept of the tying run being no closer to scoring until she is actually running the bases.
A bad throw to third here resulting in the runner scoring gives the offense no momentum, because it puts the offense no closer to getting the game tied than it was as soon as that batter/runner reached base. If the defense feels like things are falling apart or it is giving the offense momentum by making that throw, then someone needs to explain the math to the defense.
Anyway, I hope that makes some sense. One can argue the momentum angle, but I say even that is incorrect because it assumes neither team understands the concept of the tying run. Further, I can't measure momentum. I can measure the number of runs needed to tie the game and the number of outs needed to win the game.