default
Member
I am usually an ardent fan of discretion about naming names in critical posts, but my gut has me agreeing with Musty on this one. In fact, I would say that swearing at the girls for an entire game might even be cause alone for naming names. (I've been known to slip a few times on the "word choice" issue, but it's always been a spontaneous reaction to something really dramatic on the field of play; unlike Musty, I think that swearing at the girls in the dugout regarding their play is indeed a form of abuse).
There are enough people associated with large organizations who read OFC that it is likely to come to the attention of a coach that he or she is being charged with serious misconduct. The coach can then tell his or her side of the story.
My friend The Bear is likely to disagree with Musty and me. It is a close question whether personal identification of a coach and charges of misconduct should be allowed, so if The Bear closes this thread down and even excises the name of the organization, that's one rational response that could be taken to the situation. I just hate to think that either 1) some future player will be sworn at or made to stand for an entire game in the sun or 2) some coach has been inaccurately accused of misconduct and doesn't have the opportunity to respond. On the latter point, many people have already read the identification, so even excising that doesn't really protect the coach in question.
There are enough people associated with large organizations who read OFC that it is likely to come to the attention of a coach that he or she is being charged with serious misconduct. The coach can then tell his or her side of the story.
My friend The Bear is likely to disagree with Musty and me. It is a close question whether personal identification of a coach and charges of misconduct should be allowed, so if The Bear closes this thread down and even excises the name of the organization, that's one rational response that could be taken to the situation. I just hate to think that either 1) some future player will be sworn at or made to stand for an entire game in the sun or 2) some coach has been inaccurately accused of misconduct and doesn't have the opportunity to respond. On the latter point, many people have already read the identification, so even excising that doesn't really protect the coach in question.