default
Member
Our best infielder played ss and did a terrific job. But now that the season is over and just reflecting on everything, I'm wondering if she was wasted at short. 2nd and especially 3rd received WAY more chances, and the errors from the 3rd base position were extremely costly. So many bunts, routine grounders, etc. that should have been outs turned into "hits" (12U).
Just curious, especially from you coaches, whether it makes sense to keep your most talented infielder at ss when she doesn't receive nearly the number of chances that 3rd or 2nd receive. Or perhaps this was just an anomaly and most teams do receive more chances at short? I'm thinking that if you have the choice of being exceptional at third and just average at short that would be better than exceptional at ss and just average at third.
Seems to me the one of the trademarks of all the realy good teams we played this year was that they had an terrific player at 3rd. Aggressive, fearless, would cut the ball off and make strong accurate throw to first.
Any opinions??
Just curious, especially from you coaches, whether it makes sense to keep your most talented infielder at ss when she doesn't receive nearly the number of chances that 3rd or 2nd receive. Or perhaps this was just an anomaly and most teams do receive more chances at short? I'm thinking that if you have the choice of being exceptional at third and just average at short that would be better than exceptional at ss and just average at third.
Seems to me the one of the trademarks of all the realy good teams we played this year was that they had an terrific player at 3rd. Aggressive, fearless, would cut the ball off and make strong accurate throw to first.
Any opinions??