NCAA proposal ?(AKA The Mowatt Agenda)

default

default

Member
INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. -

By Greg Johnson, The NCAA News

Softball teams around the nation are going to have to break out more chalk if the Playing Rules Oversight Panel approves a recommendation by the NCAA Softball Rules Committee.

Next spring, the rules committee wants to see two nine-foot lines painted on the field, beginning within the outer edges of the pitching plate (rubber) that extend toward the inner edges of the batter's boxes.

The new lines will clearly mark the pitcher's lane that is already defined in the rulebook. If the change is approved, instead of an umpire making a judgment call as to whether a pitcher took too wide a stride while delivering the ball, it will be clearly defined.

The Playing Rules Oversight Panel will meet via conference call September 3 to consider the recommendation.

If the pitcher's foot is completely outside the line on her stride, the pitch is illegal. If the batter does not reach first base safely and all other base runners safely advance at least one base, then the offensive team would have the option of taking the results of the play or having the effect of the illegal pitch enforced.

When the offensive team elects to have the result of the illegal pitch, a ball is called on the batter and any base runners advance one base.

"This has been on our radar for a while," said Dee Abrahamson, NCAA secretary-rules editor for softball. "It will be a visual cue for the pitcher to know where she is allowed to step. It's better for the umpire because he or she has a visual aid to help with the rule."

The rules committee thought a modification of the rule was needed because pitchers can gain too much of an advantage the wider they are allowed to stride.

"When you throw a curveball or a screwball, the more you can get your hips out of the way the more spin you can get on the ball," Abrahamson said. "We've always said you have to go forward within the imaginary lines. Now, we're giving you a visual indication of where those lines are."

Two other proposed rule changes have to do with safety issues.

The first calls for any student-athlete coaching at first or third base to wear a helmet, which would make the NCAA rule consistent with both the National Federation of State High School Associations and the Amateur Softball Association playing rules. Adult coaches would not be required to wear helmets while coaching the base runners.

The committee also recommended a change to a rule involving a thrown bat on a backswing. On the first occurrence, the entire team would be warned. If another bat is thrown carelessly on a backswing by a player on the team that has received the warning, that player would be subject to ejection from the game.

Previously, each individual was allowed one warning and could be ejected on a second violation.

The committee believes the change will better protect the catcher and home-plate umpire, as well as the on-deck batter.
 
default

default

Member
NCS---great info! ?(luv the AKA, lol) ?:cool:

So how do you feel about these proposed changes? ?:-?

Personally, I think the chalk lines to mark the pitching lane are waaaay overdue. ?My dd got called during the school season for stepping out of the lane. ?I figure, if it's so important, and they're gonna get called on it and penalties imposed---better to take the guess work out of it and have it marked clearly for the umps.

Don't see why the helmet on the student/player coaching on the ends would cause any controversy---seems reasonable.

Not sure how I feel about the bat-throwing warning issue. ?? ?Is bat-throwing really that big a problem? ?And is it fair to be ejected on a first offense just because one of your teammates also had a problem? ?I don't know. ?:-/
 
default

default

Member
Re: NCAA proposal  (AKA The Mowatt Agenda)

Two quick thoughts on the subject before I head off to practice...

1) A chalk line won't last very long (heck we're lucky to even have batter's boxes sometimes)

2) Reduce the penalty of illegal pitch, to ball (or result of play). Reason, umps are more likely to call this (and other pitching violations) if the penalty wasn't so harsh.
 
default

default

Member
cshilt said:
Two quick thoughts on the subject before I head off to practice...

1) A chalk line won't last very long (heck we're lucky to even have batter's boxes sometimes)

2) Reduce the penalty of illegal pitch, to ball (or result of play). Reason, umps are more likely to call this (and other pitching violations) if the penalty wasn't so harsh.

1. ?Excellent point ?:D
2. ?Brilliant idea ?:cool:
 
default

default

Member
Re: NCAA proposal  (AKA The Mowatt Agenda)

cshilt I know what you mean on just having a batters box properly laid out however now with as much attention as this is getting more selective enforcement will be given to the princess in the circle drama and in most cases there is always a circle however no batters box...ask Bretman about batters boxes.

There is a rule about wiping out the batters box...rarely enforced however I bet this one will be by both coaches versus the coach or team that has the good slappers and wants the edge of being able to use the lines versus abuse the lines by not putting in a batters box and leaving it up to the judgment of the umpire to determine versus no ground crews or chalk or whatever excuse they use for not putting the lines down.

In my opinion this will be enforced more than the batters box or may even draw some attention to having the field laid out properly which is not a bad idea anyway.
 
default

default

Member
Re: NCAA proposal  (AKA The Mowatt Agenda)

I don't think I've ever seen a college (conference) game where there was no batters box. This seemed to refer to an NCAA proposal, so I think you would see ALL lines marked (including this new pitcher's lane) before each conference game. If it trickled down to ASA and high school, it probably would depend on how strict the enforcement is by each sanctioning body as to whether they were drawn or not.
 

Similar threads

N
Replies
0
Views
33
NCAA.com > softball d1 articles and video
N
R
Replies
0
Views
62
Ryan Connors |NCAA.com
R
R
Replies
0
Views
69
Ryan Connors |NCAA.com
R
R
Replies
0
Views
53
Ryan Connors |NCAA.com
R
Top