Pitching and Pitchers Discussion 10U Strike Zone

default

default

Member
Bretman --
With you being the Resident Rule Expert I have a question:

Is the "black" part of the plate? I would think this in an easy "yes" or "no". At least I hope it is.

Thanks
 
default

default

Member
Had the privelege of meeting and having Bretman officiate our last two games today. He did an outstanding job.

It was kind of funny because I remembered he said he would be working Westerville today on a previous post. Then we we got our umps for the semi final and he said his name was Brett I asked "are you the famous Bretman"?

He looked a bit surprised at the question but then said that was him I said, "glad to meet you, I'm Mad Hornet". He was a true professional as were Ray, Lou, and Claire who worked the field. Actually all the umps at Westerville did an outstanding job and were professionals at all times. Good job crew!

Talking about putting the pressure on! :lmao::lmao:
 
default

default

Member
Is the black part of the plate? This issue usually only comes up in a few circumstances.

- For pitches and how they relate to passing through the strike zone.

Technically, the strike zone is 17" wide and that is exactly what the white part of the plate should measure. So, no, in this case the black beveled edge shound not be regarded as "part of strike zone".

Now, for practical purposes this really shouldn't be an issue. The beveled edge of the plate, depending on how thick the plate is and how much of it is buried in the dirt, will be extended beyond the white maybe 1/4"- 1/2" on each side. I don't care who you are, or how good you might be, or what level of ball you're working- you are NOT going to be able to discern a less than 1/2" deviation in the path of a rapidly moving ball, as it relates to some imaginary three-dimensional object floating in space (the strike zone).

The strike zone is 17" wide, so is the white part of the plate and any ball that "nicks the corner" of the strike zone is a strike. The term "it caught the black" isn't based on some actual point of the rules that should be taken literally. It's really just a slang kind of way to say "that pitch just nicked the corner".

- In slow pitch softball to determine if a pitch hit the plate or not.

Okay, not too many people here might care about slow pitch. But, in that game, where a pitch hitting the plate is an automatic ball, it can be an issue. A pitcher might argue that the pitch hit "the black part of the plate" and thus did not hit the plate itself (which could, in theory, mean that it was a strike).

This one's been debunked by simple geometry. Given the diameter of the ball and the beveled edge of the plate, it is impossible for a ball to touch ONLY the beveled edge without also touching the white part of the plate.

Here, if the pitch physically "hit the black", then it had to have hit the white and can be regarded as having "hit the plate".

- For the purpose of a runner touching the plate while running the bases.

If a runner crosses the plate and somehow manages to just touch that tiny black edge, or if a runner slides in and touches the black, then she is considered to have touched the plate. The black edge of the plate IS part of the plate in this case. It is the side of the base, exactly the same as all the other bases have a vertical edge to them that the runner may touch.
 
default

default

Member
Are you serious!!!:eek:...Have you not ever heard of the Akron Racers???

http://www.akronracers.org/

header_new.jpg

No, would like to see more of the professional softball though.
 
default

default

Member
Is the black part of the plate? This issue usually only comes up in a few circumstances.

- For pitches and how they relate to passing through the strike zone.

Technically, the strike zone is 17" wide and that is exactly what the white part of the plate should measure. So, no, in this case the black beveled edge shound not be regarded as "part of strike zone".

Now, for practical purposes this really shouldn't be an issue. The beveled edge of the plate, depending on how thick the plate is and how much of it is buried in the dirt, will be extended beyond the white maybe 1/4"- 1/2" on each side. I don't care who you are, or how good you might be, or what level of ball you're working- you are NOT going to be able to discern a less than 1/2" deviation in the path of a rapidly moving ball, as it relates to some imaginary three-dimensional object floating in space (the strike zone).

The strike zone is 17" wide, so is the white part of the plate and any ball that "nicks the corner" of the strike zone is a strike. The term "it caught the black" isn't based on some actual point of the rules that should be taken literally. It's really just a slang kind of way to say "that pitch just nicked the corner".

- In slow pitch softball to determine if a pitch hit the plate or not.

Okay, not too many people here might care about slow pitch. But, in that game, where a pitch hitting the plate is an automatic ball, it can be an issue. A pitcher might argue that the pitch hit "the black part of the plate" and thus did not hit the plate itself (which could, in theory, mean that it was a strike).

This one's been debunked by simple geometry. Given the diameter of the ball and the beveled edge of the plate, it is impossible for a ball to touch ONLY the beveled edge without also touching the white part of the plate.

Here, if the pitch physically "hit the black", then it had to have hit the white and can be regarded as having "hit the plate".

- For the purpose of a runner touching the plate while running the bases.

If a runner crosses the plate and somehow manages to just touch that tiny black edge, or if a runner slides in and touches the black, then she is considered to have touched the plate. The black edge of the plate IS part of the plate in this case. It is the side of the base, exactly the same as all the other bases have a vertical edge to them that the runner may touch.

Thank You very much for the education. Now I know why everyone comes to you :)
 

Similar threads

Top