Calling Bretman, Rule interpretation

default

default

Member
bretman;417485 You're trying to place a condition/restriction/qualifier on the rule that simply doen't exist.[/QUOTE said:
Bretman, You are, undoubtedly, 100% correct. However, different views from different blues..... There's going to be as many interpretations of this ruling by officials as there are from us novices.
 
default

default

Member
Bretman, You are, undoubtedly, 100% correct. However, different views from different blues..... There's going to be as many interpretations of this ruling by officials as there are from us novices.

But this really shouldn't be an interpretation issue. The sanctioning bodies have already interpreted the rule for us. The umpire either knows the rule or he does not.

Misapplication of the playing rule would be grounds for a formal protest.
 
default

default

Member
But "mis-interpreting" is actually "not knowing" the rules....

SOme of us will argue anthing, won't we?
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
7
Views
803
bretman
B
E
Replies
4
Views
818
Evil_Dad
E
B
Replies
17
Views
755
SBFAMILY
S
Top