tygerblood
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I think poaching players is a compliment..as parents and players we have our own free will where to play..so just relax and take it as a compliment to your kid
But if you insist on comparing the two, how do companies feel about people who leave who don't give sufficient notice?
More often than not, it's NOT the kids that want to leave, it's the parents. Kids come, kids go. If they are happy they will stay. End of story. We all like to have the holier than thou attitude on here, but let's be realistic, it's a competitive sport. The girls are competitive, the coaches are competitive, the teams are competitive and the organizations are competitive. Regardless, If I see a player I'm interested in, I'm sure as heck going to plant the seed. I have players being sought after. I don't sweat it. I'm proud that they allowed me to coach them for the time being and if I can't offer them what they need, then they should bring it to my attention and leave, if I am unable to produce. Quite simple really. We seem to have this thread every 6 months on here.
I'm not a big proponent of analogies between playing on an amateur sports team, and a career position a person is paid for. There are so many differences we can get into there, not to mention a discussion about value systems and what we teach our children.
But if you insist on comparing the two, how do companies feel about people who leave who don't give sufficient notice? And how do companies feel about hiring people whose resumes are a history of jumping frequently to the next opportunity? And do you see any difference between a contracted headhunter seeking out people to fill a position they will get paid for, and a company who recruits by standing outside the doors of their competitors (or even walks in the door) and tries to recruit their people away?
I don't know if the grass is greener????
But it still needs CUT!!!!!