Drop 3rd on a Bunt

[default]

What is the ruling?

Batter attempts a bunt on 3rd strike, offers but makes no contact.
Catcher misses the ball rolls to backstop. ?First base is open.
Can batter still advance to first the same as if swinging? ?:-?

 

[default]

my thought is yes because no contact is made, thus no foul ball.

i'm sure if that's wrong someone will correct me ;D

 

[default]

Run to first.

 

[default]

That was my thought also.
We had that happen last weekend.

 

[default]

As long as the bunt attempt was judged by the plate umpire to be an attempt to hit the ball, then this would be treated exactly as any other swing and miss.

Your batter just became a batter-runner and better haul it down to first base!

 

[default]

evil dad, was it ruled this way or differently?

did the ump get it right?

 

[default]

Isn't the umpire always right?

 

[default]

What is the ruling?

Batter attempts a bunt on 3rd strike, offers but makes no contact.
Catcher misses the ball rolls to backstop. ?First base is open.
Can batter still advance to first the same as if swinging? ?:-?

Not to be a stickler for details, but did blue ring her up on the offer? You never mentioned that in your post. Was the call Strike 3 or Out, inquiring minds want to know? I say "Run like the wind".

 

[default]

Run! Forest Run!.......

 

[default]

She did offer, strike 3 called. There was confusion on both sides on whether to run or not.
She was called out. Call was in our favor. I wasn't going to argue with blue. But wanted a ruling from the board for future reference.

 

[default]

suppose the pitch was high and the batter makes an attempt to bunt the ball,ball goes over the catchers head,can she run.catcher never dropped the ball because she never caught it. is it still called a dropped third strike.

 

[default]

If Blue determines that it was an attempt, then yes, it's a drop 3rd strike. The catcher doesn't need to touch the ball for it to be considered a drop 3rd. As previously stated, Run, Forrest, Run!!

 

[default]

The question above shows some of the confusion with calling this a "dropped third strike". That term leads many to believe that the pitch must actually hit the catcher's mitt, then fall out, for this rule to be in effect.

While the term "dropped third strike" has become commonly used, and most people know what you're talking about when you use it, this isn't really the correct terminology.

Most rule books will refer to this as an "uncaught third strike". This correct term satisfies the definition of a pitched ball being caught "in flight" (that is, without touching the ground) and covers two aspects of this rule that cause the most confusion.

The first is the pitch that passes the catcher "in flight", then goes right past the catcher without being touched. That pitch is considered to be "uncaught".

The other is a pitch that bounces off the ground then is gloved by the catcher. Since this pitch did not reach the catcher "in flight", it is also considered to be "uncaught".

When the conditions for an uncaught third strike are in place (number or outs, first base occupied, etc.), the batter can try for first on either of these two pitches, just the same as if the pitch hit the catchers mitt and was dropped.