default
Member
Mike - I am not calling you or your letters out on this one. You just happen to be the only person brave enough to talk about it.
One of the things I never understood is why letters did not recruit students at OSU that were taking the Umpire Rules course. My son took it there and he said noone ever tried to get those college students on the field. I can't believe there are no other colleges that offer the same certifications. ****** used to do a great job of enlisting HS and college kids into their ref ranks. Basketball is the same way. And yet softball doesn't seem to be willing to reach out and put the effort into recruiting young talent. All you hear is that because of the coaches and parents noone wants to umpire - that's a copout. Well it is a vicious cycle isn't it?
Brettman is exactly right - there is enough stupid to go around. Something very interesting about that and other statements come to mind. The experienced umpires do the 16u and 18u games. Usually the more experienced coaches are coaching those same games. Usually the parents of players at that age have been around and they get it more. So it seems to me that more emphasis should be placed on educating the less experienced umpires and coaches - usually at the lower age groups. The parents are the tough ones here - but if the coach can't control them then the umpire has to. By addressing these things at the lower age groups it seems that the proposed reason the letters can't attract new umpires goes away........
One of the things I never understood is why letters did not recruit students at OSU that were taking the Umpire Rules course. My son took it there and he said noone ever tried to get those college students on the field. I can't believe there are no other colleges that offer the same certifications. ****** used to do a great job of enlisting HS and college kids into their ref ranks. Basketball is the same way. And yet softball doesn't seem to be willing to reach out and put the effort into recruiting young talent. All you hear is that because of the coaches and parents noone wants to umpire - that's a copout. Well it is a vicious cycle isn't it?
Brettman is exactly right - there is enough stupid to go around. Something very interesting about that and other statements come to mind. The experienced umpires do the 16u and 18u games. Usually the more experienced coaches are coaching those same games. Usually the parents of players at that age have been around and they get it more. So it seems to me that more emphasis should be placed on educating the less experienced umpires and coaches - usually at the lower age groups. The parents are the tough ones here - but if the coach can't control them then the umpire has to. By addressing these things at the lower age groups it seems that the proposed reason the letters can't attract new umpires goes away........