default
Member
Hitter 23's "edit" raises a point that I didn't make explicit, but that plays a huge role in my analysis. I do not assume that we will ever in our travel ball coaching experience have a single player that will get a full ride on athletic money alone. If that happens, we will consider ourselves lucky. But for the most part those players are going to Chicago to complete their travel ball experience. The hard cold facts, as I understand them, are that Ohio softball players who receive offers to play in college, even from the top Ohio travel ball programs, don't usually get full athletic rides. College coaches are usually looking to academic and need-based money to make the college acceptance work. Just getting in is not the complete issue for me, unless the player's family tells me that they understand they will need to pay as much as 100% of tuition and room & board (or qualify for enough need-based assistance) if their daughter is going to play in college. At that point, I haven't created any expectations for that family by styling the team as a "college exposure" team, other than the expectations 1) that the player has the stuff to make the college team; and 2) that she has the base credentials to get into the school.
For families seeking educational opportunities resulting from a combination of athletic and academic aid, the academic performance of the player is critical to both the questions of ability to get admitted to the institution (and that will vary from school to school) and to the question of getting a package that allows the player the financial means to accept any offer.
So maybe the resolution is to ask the player and her family what she expects with respect to the college question. If she has the financial means to pay for any college that she gets into, I guess her grades really aren't any of my business. But if she wants a combination of academic and athletic aid to make college a possibility, then I think I have a right to know how she is doing academically. Because there may be another player with the same aspirations who has the same level of athletic skills and is kicking butt academically.
Please be aware that I understand that this whole issue is complicated and that there are nuances, such as the learning disability issue, that make it hard to give black or white answers. I'm just hoping that the dialogue helps me to decide whether I vote for "train from the cradle" or "retool at 16u" as we face decisions for next year and helps for families to consider what they want from a college exposure team and what questions to ask during the upcoming tryout season.
For families seeking educational opportunities resulting from a combination of athletic and academic aid, the academic performance of the player is critical to both the questions of ability to get admitted to the institution (and that will vary from school to school) and to the question of getting a package that allows the player the financial means to accept any offer.
So maybe the resolution is to ask the player and her family what she expects with respect to the college question. If she has the financial means to pay for any college that she gets into, I guess her grades really aren't any of my business. But if she wants a combination of academic and athletic aid to make college a possibility, then I think I have a right to know how she is doing academically. Because there may be another player with the same aspirations who has the same level of athletic skills and is kicking butt academically.
Please be aware that I understand that this whole issue is complicated and that there are nuances, such as the learning disability issue, that make it hard to give black or white answers. I'm just hoping that the dialogue helps me to decide whether I vote for "train from the cradle" or "retool at 16u" as we face decisions for next year and helps for families to consider what they want from a college exposure team and what questions to ask during the upcoming tryout season.