default
Member
This past weekend my daughter's team was playing. She was the pitcher. There was a situation where there was a runner on first and third with two outs, and the runner on first decided to continue to second base while the ball was in the circle trying to produce a run prior to her being tagged out.
My daughter knew that the runner was advancing, but she did not take any action as she wanted to make sure the runner was too far to turn around and ensure the runner on third base could not advance. The runner stopped jogging suddenly and came to a complete stop.
Immediately my husband yelled--she's out. Of course everyone else also realized that she had stopped and also began yelling that she was out.
There were three umpires, and they did nothing until the out was made by tagging the runner and the runner from third had scored.
The coach went out and argued to no avail.
After the game, we asked the coach why the runner going to second was not out at the point she stopped running. He informed us that the umpire on the other side of the field saw my daughter's elbow twitch, and therefore the runner was not out.
This is a first for me. Is this really a call? None of the other umpires saw the twitch, but because this one that was on the other side of the elbow that supposedly twitched saw such a tiny movement, they all supported his call.
I am curious as to what others think about this call. How much movement is necessary in this instance to negate the runner being out?
My daughter knew that the runner was advancing, but she did not take any action as she wanted to make sure the runner was too far to turn around and ensure the runner on third base could not advance. The runner stopped jogging suddenly and came to a complete stop.
Immediately my husband yelled--she's out. Of course everyone else also realized that she had stopped and also began yelling that she was out.
There were three umpires, and they did nothing until the out was made by tagging the runner and the runner from third had scored.
The coach went out and argued to no avail.
After the game, we asked the coach why the runner going to second was not out at the point she stopped running. He informed us that the umpire on the other side of the field saw my daughter's elbow twitch, and therefore the runner was not out.
This is a first for me. Is this really a call? None of the other umpires saw the twitch, but because this one that was on the other side of the elbow that supposedly twitched saw such a tiny movement, they all supported his call.
I am curious as to what others think about this call. How much movement is necessary in this instance to negate the runner being out?