A request of coaches

default

default

Member
Having recruited at a few tournaments in Ohio now after having done so in the West and Pacific Northwest for a few years, it is clear to me that most of our travel teams view college exposure tournaments in a different light than those out west.

One thing I hated as a high school/travel coach is college coaches trying to tell me how I should be doing things, so take my words as a suggestion of how at least one college coach (and a few more I spoke with over the weekend) would like to see exposure teams do things.

1. Please have full information for each player, including position(s), jersey number, grad year, contact information, GPA, ACT/SAT if applicable, high school, coach contact numbers, some basic stats (preferably), preferred college major (if applicable) and anything else I'm forgetting. The Wolfpack put together a nice college coach booklet, but there is nothing they can do when teams submit no information or incomplete information.

2. Again, travel coaches of course can run their teams as they wish, but it seems to me in a tournament labeled an exposure tournament, the primary purpose would be to showcase players for college coaches. As a comparison, almost 100% of the time out west a liaision for a team will immediately find each college coach, make sure they have whatever information they need and then the teams will almost always put players at the positions where coaches want to see them. If a player is sitting who a coach wants to see, she goes in the game immediately. If a player isn't due to hit soon, they just put her up there, anyway. I watched one girl hit six times in three innings once in Huntington Beach and I was a D3 coach with no athletic money to give out.

3. Please no sac bunts. Maybe there are college coaches who want to evaluate a girl based on sac bunting, but not me. If I see a girl hit 3-4 times and need to make a decision on whether I'm interested, I really don't want to waste an at-bat with a sac bunt.

4. Let those who can run, run. If you've got speedsters, let them steal bases, regardless of the score.

5. Have team and individual profiles available on the fence. Even when the tournament provides an overall booklet, it's still extremely helpful to be able to access and keep in our files the team and individual profiles. None of us want to go up to the dugout in the middle of the game and bother a coach, so please keep them on the backstop. I would estimate about 33% of the teams at Best of the Best had this available. Out west it is nearly 100%.

On the other hand, as long as teams aren't doing these things, those girls who are marketing themselves and writing to coaches are much more likely to find a spot on a college roster.
 
default

default

Member
Great Post Joe,
Something as simple as complete profile books are not rocket science and should be a basic as a bag of balls at each outing. If your team does not have one, they are doing your DD a disservice.....

And yes showcases should be that, a showcase to see your kid. The outcome of the score is meaningless....
 
default

default

Member
JoeA; what's the big idea of injecting logic here?

My daughter's team has, at some point, done every thing you mentioned. It is sound advice. And effective.

I think the most important point is that this is an exposure opportunity. Coaches - Quit Going For The "W"! If you're there for a trophy, you're at the wrong tournament that weekend. It's about your players, not your W-L record...

:cap:
 
default

default

Member
We went to one in SC that I thought was run very well.
Here are a few strategies they used:
- Each batter started with a 1-1 count.
- After every six batters, the pitcher and catcher changed (depending on how many pitchers and catchers each team had). That way if a college rep was interested in a specific pitcher or catcher they weren't waiting around inning after inning to see the girls in action.
- Every inning started with a runner on first.
- I honestly don't think they even kept score for any of the games.
- There was no "winning" team that went home with trophies, it was all about showcasing the girls. So no brackets, pools, etc. They just paired different teams up and let them play.

I'm NOT a coach, just a parent, and my dd is too young to really get serious about any showcase events, but we went to this one and had a blast. I thought the above "rules" were really helpful in showcasing the girls.
 
default

default

Member
We went to one in SC that I thought was run very well.
Here are a few strategies they used:
- Each batter started with a 1-1 count.
- After every six batters, the pitcher and catcher changed (depending on how many pitchers and catchers each team had). That way if a college rep was interested in a specific pitcher or catcher they weren't waiting around inning after inning to see the girls in action.
- Every inning started with a runner on first.
- I honestly don't think they even kept score for any of the games.
- There was no "winning" team that went home with trophies, it was all about showcasing the girls. So no brackets, pools, etc. They just paired different teams up and let them play.

I'm NOT a coach, just a parent, and my dd is too young to really get serious about any showcase events, but we went to this one and had a blast. I thought the above "rules" were really helpful in showcasing the girls.


You see a lot of the Southern events ran that way actually. I've seen one in GA that way and the couple I know about in Texas is run that way as well, Catch. Great format. I like the runner starting on first. See speed, catcher's arm, position player tagging out, hit and runs, etc... JUST by starting a runner on first.

The one I saw in GA, a coach requested a player be placed on second base and ask for a hit ball to go through the infield from the defensive coach so he could see outfield arm strength VS runner speed.

Situation play for the coaches.
 
default

default

Member
This is great insight Joe. I would love to see this adopted at some of Ohio's biggies.
 
default

default

Member
I was in Indy this past weekend. Generally, it seemed the farther west a team was located, the better they were about this. The Illinois and the better Indiana teams had info readily available and their coaches actively sought out college coaches.

Other teams had no info available and only very limited info in the tournament booklet. Unless I had a specific girl on one of those teams to watch, we ignored those teams.

Still saw plenty of sac bunting and playing to win at all costs, but also plenty of coaches shuffling things around and understanding what a showcase is about.
 
default

default

Member
Did you go to the Touch'em All Fall Brawl at the Chuck Klein Complex? Just down the road from the Tanel 360. Saw UK and a few other coaches there. Mostly interested in the Louisville Lady Sluggers Gold 18u. We had complete team info in a nice booklet and a couple games we surely didn't play to win lol.
 
default

default

Member
No, I didn't go to that, but there were a couple of girls there I wanted to see. I had games at each time I wanted to watch at Midwest, so never left there.
 
default

default

Member
I was speaking with a Division 1 coach this past weekend. What time down to first do you believe they truly start believing your daughter is a D1 Slapper?
 
default

default

Member
I would imagine it depends on the level of D1, but I would guess from contact to first about 2.70, maybe 2.65. I know at D3 I was looking for 2.80 or better and at D2 I'm looking for 2.75 or better.
 
default

default

Member
I say we do away with "teams" and competition altogether in light of these revelations. It would certainly save a lot of money. Just have each girl show up at a particular location for a weekend carrying a few dozens copies of her own profile. Have the college coaches work out the girls using radar guns and stop watches. The coaches can pit the best pitchers against the best hitters. They can pit the best catchers against the best base stealers. They can interview all the players and their parents before, during and after the event to see if they're a good fit for a particular program. They can make offers to players on the spot. If they do this three or four times over the course of the summer, then it shouldn't be a problem for all the decent players to find a college and for all the college coaches to fill their rosters. If getting a college scholarship is the end game, and the end game is all that matters-- then why not just cut to the chase? It would make it much easier on everybody. The girls can have some competition once they get to college.
 
default

default

Member
the truth, that is nice but just because a girl is fast, doesn't make her a good baserunner, or because she can hit in practice does it make her a good hitter.

Coaches want to see them in game situations, they want to see what a girl does in a pressure situation. Alot of showcases are going back to the elimination games, for example a pennsbury, because coaches want to see how they play when something is on the line.. They also want to see what happens when things are not going right for someone.

Joe I agree to a point about not bunting and such at a showcase. I am on both sides, I coach travel as well as DIII softball. But when we go to a Team New Jersey, Pennsbury etc... your bigger showcases, if your not winning at these tournaments you don't get invited back... So when the situation calls for it, you have to do what you have to do. Now if we know for certain a college coach came to see a particular player we usually let them hit away or make a decision on their own... But most of the showcases we do now we can not afford to lose games or you lose your spot in the highly sought after tournaments.
 
Top